Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Parental Approval Mandate for Diagnosing Gender-Related Conditions in Minors under Ohio House Bill 68

Client Alert
September 4, 2024

Effective August 6, 2024, mental health professionals cannot diagnose or treat a minor presenting with a gender-related condition without first obtaining consent from one of the minor's parents, a legal custodian, or a guardian. The law, established by Ohio House Bill 68 (HB 68) and recently upheld by a Franklin County Common Pleas Court judge, imposes stringent requirements on the process that must be followed in these cases.

This mandate applies to a wide range of professionals, including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) specializing in psychiatric-mental health, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed social workers, counselors, and marriage and family therapists.

HB 68 defines a “gender-related condition” broadly to include any situation where an individual feels an incongruence between their gender identity and biological sex, with gender dysphoria being the most commonly recognized condition. Before addressing any gender-related condition, mental health professionals are required by law to first screen the minor for other comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, ADHD, and autism spectrum disorder. Additionally, professionals must assess the minor for signs of physical, sexual, mental, or emotional abuse, as well as other traumas that might be influencing the gender-related condition.

In other words, providers must account for the order of operations required by HB 68 (diagnosing gender conditions last) and parents/guardians need to fully consent to that plan of action. If providers do not take both steps, then they are considered to be engaging in “unprofessional conduct” that could subject them to discipline by their professional licensing board.

If you have any questions regarding HB 68 or would like assistance ensuring your policies and procedures comply with the new law or any of its provisions, please contact BMD Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.

Health LawHealthcare PolicyMental HealthDaphne KackloudisJordan Burdick
Client Alert

Guidance for Employers Receiving HHS Funding During COVID-19 on Civil Rights Protections

July 24, 2020On July 20, 2020, HHS OCR issued guidance to help employers receiving federal financial assistance understand their requirements to comply with applicable federal civil rights laws and regulations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in HHS-funded programs during COVID-19; specifically, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VI”). Title VI states that “[n]o person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”Client Alert

Ohio Businesses Required to Post Exceptions to State-wide Mask Mandate at all Entrances

July 23, 2020On July 22, 2020, in conjunction with the state-wide mask mandate instituted by Governor Mike DeWine, Lance D. Himes, Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, issued an order requiring Ohio businesses to post any permitted exceptions they provide to customers, patrons, visitors, contractors, vendors and similar individuals to use facial coverings at all business entrances.Client Alert

ODM and OhioMHAS Continue to Expand Telehealth

July 20, 2020On July 17, 2020, Governor DeWine signed Executive Order 2020-29D, which allowed the Ohio Department of Medicaid (“ODM”) to immediately rescind old provisions and file a new rule (5160-1-18) and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OhioMHAS”) to amend their current rule (5122-29-31), both expanding telehealth and introducing even more flexibility into Ohio’s healthcare system.Client Alert

Top Questions of Employers - Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law

July 17, 2020One month ago, the United States Supreme Court, in Bostock v. Clayton County, determined that federal law (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) protects employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Our earlier post discussed the full decision. The purpose of this article is to share and address the Top Questions of Employers since that decision was rendered.Client Alert

Healthcare Acquisitions and Divestitures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

July 9, 2020It seems as though all aspects of our personal and professional lives have been impacted in one way or another by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Healthcare acquisitions and divestitures are no exception. Although the ramifications depend on the specific circumstances of each transaction, we are noticing certain common threads woven among recently closed and currently in progress transactions in the healthcare industry. Here are a few of the questions that often arise as we work with clients to navigate the current business landscape both during and after the COVID epidemic.
Older posts
Newer posts