Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Patient Abandonment and Termination

Client Alert

Healthcare professionals have a responsibility to patients with whom they have established a treatment relationship. However, there may be some instances when they will need to terminate their relationship with a patient. This FAQ article will review when premature termination of a patient can result in legal liability and how to avoid claims of patient abandonment throughout your practice. Though many of the statutes below apply to physicians alone, other healthcare professionals like chiropractors, dentists, APRNs, etc. have similar requirements under Ohio law. 

When does a physician-patient relationship exist?

Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Section 4731-27-02 defines a physician-patient relationship for physicians in Ohio: “a physician-patient relationship is established when the physician provides service to a person to address medical needs, whether the service was provided by mutual consent or implied consent or was provided without consent pursuant to a court order. Once a physician-patient relationship is established, a person remains a patient until the relationship is terminated.” Other practitioners have a similar definition of practitioner-patient relationship.

What is patient abandonment?

Patient abandonment is a unilateral termination of the physician-patient relationship by the physician without reasonable notice for the patient to obtain alternative medical care. The elements of patient abandonment are:

  • Health care treatment was unreasonably discontinued;
  • The termination of health care was contrary to the patient’s will or without the patient’s knowledge;
  • The health care provider failed to arrange comparable alternative care;
  • The health care provider should have reasonably foreseen that harm to the patient would arise from the termination of the care;
  • The patient actually suffered harm or loss as a result of the discontinuance of care.

Essentially, the establishment of a physician-patient relationship creates a duty for the physician to care for the patient. The physician then terminated that relationship prematurely and the patient suffered harm as a result.

What are the liabilities of patient abandonment?

Physicians who are found to have abandoned patients could be subject to:

  • Medical board disciplinary action (including loss/suspension of licensure);
  • Malpractice claims;
    1. But note that patient abandonment involves intentional or reckless act(s) that could result in punitive damages which are often not covered by malpractice insurance;
  • Breach of payor contracts;
  • Personal injury damages; and/or
  • Elder abuse.

Termination of Patients – Notice Requirements

To avoid patient abandonment claims, physicians should properly terminate patients from their practice. OAC 4731-27-02(A) requires physicians to comply with the following requirements when terminating a patient:

  • Send a notice to the patient that includes:
    1. A statement that the patient relationship is terminated and a rationale for termination when appropriate;
    2. A statement that the physician will provide emergency treatment for up to 30 days from the date that the notice was mailed to allow time for the patient to find alternative care; and
    3. An offer to transfer records to a new provider upon receipt of a signed authorization.
  • The notice must be sent in one of the following ways:
    1. A letter sent via regular mail to the last address for the patient on record, with the date of mailing of the letter documented
    2. An electronic message sent via a HIPAA compliant EMR or EHR portal that provides a means of electronic communication and that can confirm the patient viewed the message.
      1. If the message is not viewed within 10 days, the physician must send a physical letter as detailed above.

The requirements of formal termination notice do not apply if: (1) the physician rendered services to the patient on an episodic basis or in an emergency setting where there is no reasonable expectation that related services will be rendered to the patient in the future; (2) the physician formally transferred the patient’s care to another health care provider in a different practice group; or (3) the patient terminated the relationship (either verbally or in writing) or has transferred care to another physician for the same condition and that these actions are recorded in the patient’s record. Also, always check any contracts with third-party payors prior to terminating any patients, since there may be additional notice or care requirements. There are also separate rules, found in OAC 4731-27-03(B) that govern the termination of a physician-patient relationship due to leaving, selling, or retiring from practice.

When to terminate a patient relationship?

In addition to leaving, selling, or retiring from practice, there are other reasons that terminating a physician-patient relationship is appropriate. These scenarios could include:

  • Immediate termination if:
    1. Patient is violent or abusive;
    2. Patient makes sexual advances to provider or staff; or
    3. Patient lies about identity or is otherwise fraudulent.
  • Termination with at least 30 days’ notice if:
    1. Repeated no-shows or non-compliance that jeopardizes patient safety;
    2. Breakdown of communication that makes it impossible to treat patient; or
    3. Consistent refusal to pay.

If immediate termination is required, consult with legal counsel immediately, call local law enforcement if necessary, and send the patient a formal termination notice as soon as possible. Except for the scenarios resulting in immediate termination, patients should always receive notice in advance of the termination of their physician-patient relationship.

Create a Patient Termination Policy

The best way to prevent patient abandonment is to have a comprehensive termination policy. The termination policy should include at a minimum:

  • Specific circumstances that may require immediate termination of the patient or termination through a termination letter
  • A procedure for whom the provider should speak prior to termination
  • A procedure for what a physician needs to do prior to termination
  • A requirement that no patient will be terminated during a critical point in the patient’s care and that the practice will comply with EMTALA (if applicable)
  • An explanation of the legal notice requirements for termination
  • A requirement that the physician or practice must seek consent for termination from the patient and must provide transitional care where termination is not immediate
  • A statement that the practice has an interest in continuity of care for patients

This is only a short summary of the requirements applicable to the termination of the physician-patient relationship. For more information or questions about terminating a provider-patient relationship, please contact Ashley Watson at abwatson@bmdllc.com or your local BMD healthcare attorney.  


Employer Liability for COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

As employers encourage or require employees to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, they should be aware of OSHA recording obligations and potential workers’ compensation liability. Though OSHA has yet to revise its COVID-19 guidance in response to the latest CDC recommendations, OSHA has revised its position regarding the recording of injury or illness resulting from the vaccine. Until now, OSHA required an employer to record an adverse reaction when the vaccine was required for employees and the injury or illness otherwise met the recording criteria (work-related, a new case, and meets one or more of the general recording criteria). OSHA has reversed course and announced that it will not require recording adverse reactions until at least May 2022, irrespective of whether the employer requires the vaccine as a condition of employment. In its revised COVID-19 FAQs, OSHA states:

The New Rule 1.510 - Radical Change for Summary Judgement Procedure in Florida

In civil litigation, where both sides participate actively, trial is usually required at the end of a long, expensive case to determine a winner and a loser. In federal and most state courts, however, there are a few procedural shortcuts by which parties can seek to prevail in advance of trial, saving time, money and annoyance. The most common of these is the “motion for summary judgment”: a request to the court by one side for judgment before trial, generally on the basis that the evidence available reflects that a win for that party is legally inevitable and thus required. Effective May 1, 2021, summary judgment procedure in Florida has radically changed.

Vacating, Modifying or Correcting an Arbitration Award Under R.C. 2711.13: Three-Month Limitation Maximum; Not Guaranteed Amount of Time

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that neither R.C. 2711.09 nor R.C. 2711.13 requires a court to wait three months after an arbitration award is issued before confirming the award. R.C. 2711.13 provides that “after an award in an arbitration proceeding is made, any party to the arbitration may file a motion in the court of common pleas for an order vacating, modifying, or correcting the award.” Any such motion to vacate, modify, or correct an award “must be served upon the adverse party or his attorney within three months after the award is delivered to the parties in interest.” In BST Ohio Corporation et al. v. Wolgang, the Court held the three-month period set forth in R.C. 2711.13 is not a guaranteed time period in which to file a motion to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award. 2021-Ohio-1785.

EEOC Provides Updated Guidance Regarding Employer COVID-19 Vaccine Policies

On May 28, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission updated its guidance regarding employer COVID-19 vaccination policies. The new guidance provides much-needed clarification of expectations for employers seeking to promote workplace safety and prevent the spread of COVID-19, including discussion of mandatory vaccination policies, voluntary vaccination incentives, and accommodation of employees based on disability or sincerely held religious beliefs. The full text of the update is found in Section K of the EEOC’s COVID Q&A document. You can also learn more about these and other developments from BMD's Bryan Meek and Monica Andress through the Employment Law After Hours YouTube channel, available here.

What Telemedical Barriers Practices Face and How They Can Manage Them

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to many businesses and industries having to rapidly adapt new practices in order to stay profitable, and the healthcare industry is no exception. Although telehealth tools and practices have existed and been used since the Vietnam War, the pandemic has caused many individual healthcare practices to heavily rely on telehealth as a large portion of their service mix in order to continue to provide care for patients. Because of this rapid adoption of telehealth practices in order to combat the restrictions of COVID-19, the telemedicine industry’s revenue has exploded in the last year. Experts predict that telehealth will continue to grow in use beyond the current pandemic, estimating the industry’s worth to be $25 billion by 2025. However, this rapid adoption of telehealth was prompted out of need and has not been without its own barriers that practices now face.