Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Pregnant Employee Protections - New Requirements for Employers

Multimedia, Client Alert
April 11, 2023

Two new laws were recently passed providing additional protections for pregnant employees in the workplace. These statutes are: (1) the PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act (otherwise known as the Pump Act), and (2) the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. These statutes contain the biggest changes for pregnant employees since the implementation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. The requirements of these statutes will require employers with more than 15 employees to implement new policies for their handbooks. More information on flat fee options for these policies is provided below.

Generally, the PUMP Act requires employers to set aside a temporary or permanent private place (other than a restroom) for the purpose of allowing employees to express breastmilk. Employers must provide employees with this break time, and this time must be paid if other paid break times are provided. This Act went into effect on December 29, 2022.

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act contains the biggest changes for pregnant employees. This Act, which begins on June 27, 2023, requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide “reasonable accommodations” to a pregnant employee’s known limitations related to pregnancy or childbirth. Importantly, these limitations do not need to rise to the level of a “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act in order to be accommodated. This will provide almost guaranteed coverage for pregnant employees.

A few examples provided by the DOL include: the ability to sit or drink water; receive closer parking; have flexible hours; receive appropriately sized uniforms and safety apparel; receive additional break time to use the bathroom, eat, and rest; take leave or time off to recover from childbirth; work-from-home; and be excused from strenuous activities and/or activities that involve exposure to compounds not safe for pregnancy. However, this Act specifically states an employer cannot require an employee to take leave (paid or unpaid) if another reasonable accommodation can be provided that would let the employee keep working.

Similar to the ADA, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations unless they would cause an “undue hardship” on the employer’s operations. An “undue hardship” is a significant difficulty or expense for the employer. This is a high standard to meet that should involve an attorney’s review and oversight.

These changes will require the implementation of two new policies for the vast majority of employers (more than 15 employees). Therefore, I am offering a bundle option for our clients. Clients can receive both policies for a flat fee of $500, which can include minor customization specific to the employer’s requirements. This flat fee will also include an overview telephone conference for implementation of the new requirements. In addition, if a client has not had their handbook audited in the last year, we recommend a general handbook audit to ensure compliance with all new employment laws and regulations. We will offer a flat fee that includes both the handbook audit and the two new pregnant employee policies for $1500.

Employment Law After Hours published a YouTube Podcast further explaining these statutes and their requirements. Click below to view the episode featuring BMD Labor & Employment Partner, Bryan Meek. 

For more information, contact Bryan at bmeek@bmdllc.com or 330.253.5586.

Employement LawEmployment Law After HoursPregnancy DiscriminationPregnant Workers Fairness Act
Client Alert

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

February 26, 2025Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.Client Alert

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

February 25, 2025In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.Client Alert

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

February 20, 2025The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.Client Alert

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

February 11, 2025Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.Client Alert

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

January 30, 2025President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.
Older posts
Newer posts