Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Telemedicine Flexibilities Extended to March 31, 2025

Client Alert

The passage of the American Relief Act, 2025 extends certain telehealth flexibilities through March 31, 2025. Telehealth flexibilities were implemented in response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) seeking to expand access to care and reduce the risk of exposure to the virus.

Before the PHE, Medicare offered limited coverage for certain telehealth services for beneficiaries who lived far away from Medicare providers. Under Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, Medicare patients were covered for these services if they were seen at an approved originating site, such as a physician’s office or a hospital, that was located within a rural health professional shortage area, in a county that is not included in a Metropolitan Statistical Area, or from an entity that participates in a Federal telemedicine demonstration project approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).[1] The telehealth flexibilities granted during the PHE waived these geographic and originating site requirements[2], allowing providers to offer telehealth services to Medicare patients in their homes and other locations, and in other areas of the country.[3]

Without the passage of the American Relief Act, the Medicare telehealth coverage requirements were set to revert back to the original Medicare coverage criteria, which required the patient to be located at an approved originating site – which did not include the patient’s home. 

In addition to the removal of the geographic and originating site requirements, the flexibilities during the PHE expanded the list of practitioners who could provide these services[4], enhanced telehealth services for Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics[5], delayed the in-person requirements for telehealth mental health services[6], allowed for audio-only telehealth services[7], and permitted the use of telehealth to conduct the required face-to-face encounter prior to recertification of eligibility for hospice care.[8]

While the PHE has ended, the expansion of telehealth services has been a positive development for both patients and providers. As a result, new legislation as part of the American Relief Act, 2025, extended the deadline from December 31, 2024 to March 31, 2025, which has been a welcome relief.  However, this is only a temporary fix and Congress will need to pass legislation to permanently implement these telehealth expansion rules.  

If you have any questions about the extension of telehealth flexibilities, please contact Vice President Amanda Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

*The delay for in-person requirements for telehealth mental health services was extended from January 1, 2025 to April 1, 2025.


[1]  42 USCA § 1395m(m)(4)(C).

[2] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(2)(B)(iii).

[3]  Making Telehealth Flexibilities Permanent: Legislation or Regulation?, American Hospital Association (June 2020), fact-sheet-making-telehealth-flexibilities-permanent-legislation-or-regulation.pdf.

[4] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(4)(E).

[5] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(8)(A).

[6] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(7)(B)(i); 42 USCA § 1395m(o)(4)(B); 42 USCA § 1395m(y)(2).

[7]  42 USCA § 1395m(m)(9).

[8]  42 USCA § 1395f(a)(7)(D)(i)(II).


Florida's Recent Ruling on Arbitration Clauses

Florida’s recent ruling on arbitration clauses provides a crucial distinction in determining whether such clauses are void as against public policy and providers may have the opportunity to include arbitration clauses in their patient consent forms. On March 6, 2024, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed and remanded Florida’s Fifteenth Circuit Court ruling of Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson. The Court of Appeals ruled that the parties’ arbitration agreement did not contradict the Legislature’s intent of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “MMA”), but rather reflects the parties’ choice to arbitrate claims entirely outside of the MMA’s framework. Therefore, the Court found that the agreement was not void as against public policy.

Corporate Transparency Act Update 3/14/24

On March 1, 2024, a federal district court in the Northern District of Alabama concluded that the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) exceeded Congressional powers and enjoined the Department of the Treasury from enforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs. National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.). On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed the district court’s decision to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Ohio State University Launches Its Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program

In response to Ohio’s nursing shortage, The Ohio State University College of Nursing is accepting applications for its new Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing program (aBSN). Created for students with a bachelor’s degree in non-nursing fields, the aBSN allows such students to obtain their nursing degree within 18 months. All aBSN students will participate in high-quality coursework and gain valuable clinical experience. Upon completion of the program, graduates will be eligible to take the State Board, National Council of Licensure Exam for Registered Nursing (NCLEX-RN).

Another Transparency Obligation: The FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

Many physician practices and healthcare businesses are facing a new set of federal transparency requirements that require action now. The U.S. Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements (the “Rule”), which was promulgated pursuant to the 2021 bipartisan Corporate Transparency Act, is intended to help curb illegal finance and other impermissible activity in the United States.

“In for a Penny, in for a Pound” is No Longer the Case for Florida Lawyers

On April 1, 2024, newly adopted Rule 1.041 to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures goes into effect which creates a procedure for an attorney to appear in a limited manner in civil proceedings.  Currently, when a Florida attorney appears in a civil proceeding, he or she is reasonable for handling all aspects of the case for their client.  This new rule authorizes an attorney to file a notice limiting the attorney’s appearance to particular proceedings or specified matters prior to any appearance before the court.  For example, an attorney can now appear for the limited purpose of filing and arguing a motion to dismiss.  Once the motion to dismiss is heard by the court, the attorney may file a notice of termination of limited appearance and will have no further obligations in the case.