Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Telemedicine Flexibilities Extended to March 31, 2025

Client Alert

The passage of the American Relief Act, 2025 extends certain telehealth flexibilities through March 31, 2025. Telehealth flexibilities were implemented in response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) seeking to expand access to care and reduce the risk of exposure to the virus.

Before the PHE, Medicare offered limited coverage for certain telehealth services for beneficiaries who lived far away from Medicare providers. Under Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, Medicare patients were covered for these services if they were seen at an approved originating site, such as a physician’s office or a hospital, that was located within a rural health professional shortage area, in a county that is not included in a Metropolitan Statistical Area, or from an entity that participates in a Federal telemedicine demonstration project approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).[1] The telehealth flexibilities granted during the PHE waived these geographic and originating site requirements[2], allowing providers to offer telehealth services to Medicare patients in their homes and other locations, and in other areas of the country.[3]

Without the passage of the American Relief Act, the Medicare telehealth coverage requirements were set to revert back to the original Medicare coverage criteria, which required the patient to be located at an approved originating site – which did not include the patient’s home. 

In addition to the removal of the geographic and originating site requirements, the flexibilities during the PHE expanded the list of practitioners who could provide these services[4], enhanced telehealth services for Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics[5], delayed the in-person requirements for telehealth mental health services[6], allowed for audio-only telehealth services[7], and permitted the use of telehealth to conduct the required face-to-face encounter prior to recertification of eligibility for hospice care.[8]

While the PHE has ended, the expansion of telehealth services has been a positive development for both patients and providers. As a result, new legislation as part of the American Relief Act, 2025, extended the deadline from December 31, 2024 to March 31, 2025, which has been a welcome relief.  However, this is only a temporary fix and Congress will need to pass legislation to permanently implement these telehealth expansion rules.  

If you have any questions about the extension of telehealth flexibilities, please contact Vice President Amanda Waesch at alwaesch@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.

*The delay for in-person requirements for telehealth mental health services was extended from January 1, 2025 to April 1, 2025.


[1]  42 USCA § 1395m(m)(4)(C).

[2] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(2)(B)(iii).

[3]  Making Telehealth Flexibilities Permanent: Legislation or Regulation?, American Hospital Association (June 2020), fact-sheet-making-telehealth-flexibilities-permanent-legislation-or-regulation.pdf.

[4] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(4)(E).

[5] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(8)(A).

[6] 42 USCA § 1395m(m)(7)(B)(i); 42 USCA § 1395m(o)(4)(B); 42 USCA § 1395m(y)(2).

[7]  42 USCA § 1395m(m)(9).

[8]  42 USCA § 1395f(a)(7)(D)(i)(II).


What Inpatient Behavioral Health Providers Need to Know About ODM's New Draft Rule for Reimbursements

Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) recently released a draft rule that will transform how inpatient behavioral health services are reimbursed for some hospitals. ODM will migrate inpatient payments for behavioral health and substance use disorder services (BH/SUD) provided by freestanding psychiatric hospitals (FSPs) from the APR-DRG payment methodology to a per diem payment methodology derived from the APR-DRG system.

BMD Named to the 2024 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”

Brennan Manna & Diamond (BMD) is recognized among the leading law firms in the nation according to the 2024 Edition of U.S. News – Best Lawyers®  "Best Law Firms." The firm has ranked in in 13 practice areas and has earned “National Tier 1” rankings in Health Care Law and Litigation-Trusts & Estates.

Friendly Physician Models: The Basics Through 5 Frequently Asked Questions

During the past several years, many health law practices have noticed a dramatic increase in the number of telehealth businesses and private equity backed health care providers. Both of these trends often rely heavily on corporate structures commonly referred to as “friendly physician,” “captive PC” or “MSO” models. Although friendly physician models are used by non-physician health care providers (e.g., physical therapists, psychologists, and dentists), this article focuses on physicians and how the model is used in connection with the provision of professional medical services.

The DOL and EEOC Enter a Partnership to Strengthen Federal Employment Law Enforcement

On September 13, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to work together in enforcing federal employment laws. The MOU forms a partnership between the two agencies to encourage coordination through information sharing, joint investigations, training, and outreach.

Proposed Laboratory Arrangement Draws Heightened Scrutiny from the OIG

On September 25, 2023, the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) issued Advisory Opinion 23-06 (AO). The Opinion involved a proposed arrangement between an independent laboratory and other physician laboratories for the purchase of the technical component of anatomic pathology services. The OIG ultimately concluded that the arrangement at issue, if it was entered into with the requisite intent, would implicate the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and constitute grounds for sanctions.