Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

The NLRB Limits the Reach of Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements Overruling Trump-Era Policies

Client Alert


California Severance Agreement Requirements | Minnis & Smallets LLP |  Employment Law Attorney San Francisco

Employers should exercise caution and closely examine the content of severance agreements to ensure compliance with a recent National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision.  On February 21, 2023, the NLRB restricted the breadth of permissible language of confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses when it issued its decision in McLaren Macomb and overruled its Trump-era decisions in Baylor University Medical Center and IGT d/b/a International Game Technology.


Which employers are covered by the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”)?


The NLRA covers most private sector employees, including manufacturers, retailers, private universities, and healthcare facilities.  It does not apply to federal, state, or local governments; employers in the agricultural sector; and employers involved in interstate railroads and airlines.  29 U.S.C. §152(2). 


Who is an employee?


An employee is a person without supervisory responsibilities and powers.  A supervisor is defined by the NLRA to be “any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them…”  29 U.S.C. §152(11).


The McLaren Macomb Decision


This case arose from a confidentiality and a non-disparagement provision present in a severance agreement that was presented to eleven employees that were permanently furloughed at the onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.  The furlough occurred as a result of the federal government’s regulations prohibiting elective and outpatient procedures.  Also, “nonessential employees” were prohibited from working inside the hospital, necessitating a furlough, which was a common experience in the healthcare industry at that time.  The clauses at issue state,


Confidentiality Agreement.  The Employee acknowledges that the terms of this Agreement are confidential and agrees not to disclose them to any third person, other than spouse, or as necessary to professional advisors for the purposes of obtaining legal counsel or tax advice, or unless legally compelled to do so by a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction.


Non-Disclosure.  At all times hereafter, the Employee promises and agrees not to disclose information, knowledge or materials of a confidential, privileged, or proprietary nature of which the Employee has or had knowledge of, or involvement with, by reason of the Employee’s employment.  At all times hereafter, the Employee agrees not to make statements to Employer’s employees or to the general public which could disparage or harm the image of Employer, its parent and affiliated entities and their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives.    


McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58, 2 (2023).  The Board held that “Examining the language of the severance agreement here, we conclude that the nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees’ exercise of Section 7 rights.”  Moreover, even “proffering” or presenting an employee with a severance agreement with such language constituted a violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA.  Id.


Regarding the non-disparagement provision, the Board reasoned that the provision was overly broad because it was not limited to just the Respondent-employer, but included “its parents and affiliated entities and their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives” and also included no temporal limitation. 


As to the confidentiality provision, the Board was also concerned about the chilling effect on Section 7 rights of employees because it would prohibit the employee from providing information to the Board concerning the employee’s rights under the NLRA or cooperating with a Board investigation.  The Board affirmed, “established public policy that all persons with knowledge of unfair labor practices should be free from coercion in cooperating with the Board.” 


What is appropriate?


This decision creates cause for caution for covered employers.  Before a severance agreement is offered to an employee, employers should consult with legal counsel familiar with employment law issues to ensure that the agreement is compliant with McLaren Macomb. Careful revision of any potential severance agreements, especially confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions, should occur before offering a severance agreement to an employee as the NLRB has clearly returned to more restrictive standards.     

BMD’s Labor and Employment team is here to answer any questions employers may have about compliance with the NLRB's decision and other state and federal laws regarding employment. If you have any questions about this topic or wish to discuss, please contact Bryan Meek at or Angelina Gingo at

Corporate Transparency Act: Business Owners Must Act Now

The Corporate Transparency Act requires all reporting companies to file their Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report by year-end to avoid penalties. Companies formed before January 1, 2024, have less than six months to comply. Learn more in a client alert by BMD Member Blake Gerney.

New Medicare Billing Rules: What MFTs, MHCs, and IOP Providers Need to Know

Starting January 1, 2024, Medicare began covering services provided to Medicare beneficiaries by marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors, and Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) services. With this change, Medicare has become the primary payer for these services.

Chevron Doctrine No More: What the Supreme Court’s Ruling Means for Agency Authority

On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court invalidated the Chevron doctrine, nearly 40 years after it first took effect.

Ohio Board of Pharmacy Update: Key Regulatory Changes and Proposals You Need to Know

The Ohio Board of Pharmacy (BOP) has rescinded certain OAC rules (OAC 4729:5-18-01 through 4729:5-18-06), removing regulations on office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) clinics. The rescissions took effect on June 3, 2024. The BOP also published a new rule, OAC 4729:8-5-01, which sets explicit reporting guidelines for licensed dispensaries and became effective on June 7, 2024.

LGBTQIA+ Patients and Discrimination in Healthcare

In early April, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a study outlining the challenges that LGBT adults face in the United States related to healthcare. According to the study, LGBT patients are “twice as likely as non-LGBT adults to report negative experiences while receiving health care in the last three years, including being treated unfairly or with disrespect (33% v. 15%) or having at least one of several other negative experiences with a provider (61% v. 31%), including a provider assuming something about them without asking, suggesting they were personally to blame for a health problem, ignoring a direct request or question, or refusing to prescribe needed pain medication.”