Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

USCIS Policy Updates: Implications for Business Immigration

Client Alert
August 20, 2025

Summary of Recent USCIS Policy Memos

In August 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued three key policy updates enhancing vetting, good moral character (GMC) evaluations, and scrutiny of "anti-American" conduct in immigration adjudications. These changes emphasize national security, fraud detection, and alignment with the current administration’s defined U.S. values. These policy memos will impact employers sponsoring foreign workers, including H-1B, L-1, EB visas, adjustments, and naturalization.

  1. August 1 Policy: Reestablishing Screening and Vetting Standards
    USCIS updated its Policy Manual to clarify interview criteria for asylees, refugees, and derivatives adjusting to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status via Form I-485. Mandatory interviews are triggered by unverifiable identities, fraud indicators, FBI fingerprint hits suggesting inadmissibility, ties to state sponsors of terrorism, or national security concerns. This lowers the burden of what may be a terrorism-related ground to “an articulable concern.” The stated goal is to detect misrepresentation and public safety risks.
  2. August 15 Policy: Restoring Good Moral Character Evaluations
    This memorandum restores a holistic, totality-of-circumstances GMC standard for naturalization under INA § 316(a). Adjudicators must weigh positive factors (e.g., community involvement, stable employment) against disqualifiers (e.g., aggravated felonies, DUIs), including unlisted conduct contrary to societal norms. Rehabilitation evidence is considered, but the focus is on alignment with "average citizen" standards. No longer is the absence of negative factors enough; applicants must demonstrate positive factors. This memo is effective August 15, 2025.
  3. August 19 Policy: Considering Anti-Americanism in Benefit Requests
    USCIS now treats "anti-Americanism" as a basis for terminating or denying discretionary relief, such as employment-based visas. This sweepingly broad category defines the term as endorsing terrorist organizations, anti-American ideologies, or antisemitic terrorism. Defining “anti-Americanism” is obviously subject to the definitions of the ruling party at the time of the determination. This new policy consideration includes past compliance with immigration laws and expands social media vetting to screen for such activity. This policy is also effective immediately, applying to pending and future requests and renewal applications for those already in the U.S.

DHS References to Social Media Vetting: DHS and USCIS have integrated social media screening into immigration processes, requiring applicants to disclose handles on forms for review. Policies since April 2025 screen for antisemitism and anti-Americanism, potentially denying benefits or initiating revocations based on posts endorsing harmful ideologies. This extends to all benefit requests, including H-1B extensions and adjustments. Social media now screened for antisemitism/anti-American content.  Even  old conduct from years ago may now become relevant.

These policies signal a shift toward rigorous, ongoing scrutiny, where post-grant conduct could trigger reviews during renewals or extensions.

Key Risks and Best Practices for Employers

Risks for Current Workers:

  • USCIS may apply enhanced standards to H-1B amendments/extensions, green card renewals, or conditional LPR removals. Social media posts could flag "anti-American" issues, leading to denials or revocations.
  • Potential Outcomes: Notices to revoke status if fraud/security risks emerge, risking deportation.

Considerations for Future/New Workers:

  • Expect mandatory interviews for fraud/national security red flags in new visa applications. Anti-Americanism via social media could deny entry or visas.
  • Delays/Risks: Longer processing; denials for unverified identities or terrorism ties.

Action Steps and Best Practices:

  • Train HR on policies; audit worker files for risks (e.g., GMC issues like DUIs) before filings.
  • Monitor employees' online activity; advise against controversial posts and counsel on social media dos/don'ts.
  • Screen candidates' social media pre-hire; ensure compliance with U.S. values in applications.
  • Consult immigration counsel for filings and be proactive. Vetting can prevent issues. Stay updated: Policies apply retroactively to pending cases.

For guidance on how these updates may impact your business or immigration status, please contact BMD Member Robert Ratliff at raratliff@bmdllc.com. With over 25 years of trial experience in criminal defense and immigration law, Robert’s unique insights as a former Immigration Judge allow him to offer strategic guidance for clients facing complex immigration challenges.

ImmigrationImmigration Law
Client Alert

Laboratory Specimen Collection Arrangements with Contract Hospitals - OIG Advisory Opinion 22-09

May 3, 2022On April 28, 2022, the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) published an Advisory Opinion[1] in which it evaluated a proposed arrangement where a network of clinical laboratories (the “Requestor”) would compensate hospitals (each a “Contract Hospital”) for specimen collection, processing, and handling services (“Collection Services”) for laboratory tests furnished by the Requestor (the “Proposed Arrangement”). The OIG concluded that the Proposed Arrangement would generate prohibited remuneration under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) if the requisite intent were present. This is due to both the possibility that the proposed per-patient-encounter fee would be used to induce or reward referrals to Requestor and the associated risk of improperly steering patients to Requestor.Client Alert

Property Owner Protection from Tax Valuation Challenges

April 29, 2022New legislation provides significant new protections for commercial property owners against challenges to valuation primarily by local school boards and prohibiting side agreements to avoid tax valuation changes. The Ohio Legislature has approved House Bill 126 which will go into effect July 2022 but will effectively apply to the 2023 tax valuation year.Client Alert

No Surprises Act Update: The IDR Portal is Open

April 25, 2022The No Surprises Act (“NSA”) became effective January 1, 2022, and has been the subject of lawsuits and criticisms since its inception. The goals of the No Surprises Act are to shield patients from surprise medical bills, provide to uninsured and self-pay patients good faith estimates of charges, and create a process to resolve payment disputes over surprise bills, which arise most typically in emergency care settings. We have written about Part I and Part II of the NSA previously. This update concerns the Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) procedure created by Part II but applicable to claims covered by Part I. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) finally opened the Portal for providers to submit disputes to the IDR process following some updated guidance regarding the arbitration process itself.Client Alert

Updated FAQs for the No Surprises Act - Good Faith Estimates

April 7, 2022The No Surprises Act (“NSA”) became effective January 1, 2022. Meant to protect consumers from surprise medical bills, the new law is good for consumers, but vexatious for health care providers and facilities. One particular source of frustration is the operationalization of the Good Faith Estimate (“GFE”) requirement, governed by Part II of the regulations that implement the NSA. The GFE requirements apply broadly to all healthcare providers and facilities that practice within the scope of their state-issued license.Client Alert

IMPORTANT PRF UPDATE! HRSA Allows Providers the Opportunity to Correct Missed Period 1 Reporting

April 7, 2022Late Wednesday, April 6, HRSA announced that it was going to allow providers with extenuating circumstances that prevented them from preventing a completed Period 1 Report to submit a Request to Report Late Due to Extenuating Circumstances.
Older posts
Newer posts