Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Vaccination Considerations for Employers

Client Alert

Today, three Covid-19 vaccines have tested as highly effective (90%+ efficacy) and are advancing in the process for emergency use. This is especially welcome news in Ohio, which has skyrocketing cases and our strategic response has been to turn the entire state into the small town of Bomont with strict curfews and bans on social gatherings.[1]

Polls, for what they are worth, have indicated that only 60%-70% of Americans are somewhat or very likely to get a Covid-19 vaccine. A recently released STAT-Harris poll indicates that about 66% of adults would voluntarily receive a vaccine.

Q:        Can Employers Require a Covid-19 Vaccine?

A:        Yes (Qualified)

Private employers can require employees to receive a Covid-19 vaccine in combination with some legal and policy considerations. Before discussing those considerations, note that the EEOC has not weighed in on a Covid-19 vaccine requirement and make sure to check back for updates. However, the EEOC has already determined that the Covid-19 pandemic meets the ADA’s "direct threat” standard of posing a “significant risk of substantial harm” to those in the workplace, so its vaccination guidance is likely to be inclusive. It has previously asked employers to “encourage” rather than “require” vaccinations, but that was before Covid-19. State laws may also weigh in on mandatory vaccinations for private employers. Healthcare and public employers are subject to federal and state regulations.   

The two (2) key evaluations for all employers are Religious Exceptions and Disability Accommodations which may exempt employees from mandatory vaccinations. Employers may need to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs of employees if vaccination legitimately offends those religious beliefs. Employers may also need to provide a reasonable accommodation for qualified disabilities where the vaccination could impact underlying medical conditions. Additionally, pregnant employees may request exemption from vaccination under certain circumstances.    

From a policy perspective, employers will need to give advance notice to employees of the vaccination policy. The policy should address the purpose, the exceptions, the costs, and the alternatives. Employers should decide whether the policy applies to all employees, or only those who have close interaction, travel, provide key services, cannot remote work, and/or any other factors. Finally, the employer should also make an educated decision of when to implement the policy based upon the safety, efficacy, and availability of the vaccines. Employees who have a negative reaction to a mandatory vaccination may have a workers’ compensation claim. 

Q:        What About Anti-Vaccination Employees?

A:        Likely Yes

The anti-vax movement is small but zealous, and it is growing. However, it is rarely based on religious beliefs. If an employee objects to vaccination on medical or ethical beliefs, it will not automatically excuse a mandatory vaccine. The employee must have a qualifying disability or religious belief. Remember to check for any state opt-out laws.  

Q:        What Should Employers Do Now?

A:        Begin Planning

While all employers and all workforces are different, some universal steps employers can follow are:

  • The early adoption and notification of a vaccination policy. This can be done unilaterally or with input from the workforce, including:
    • An anonymous employee survey asking employees whether they (1) will receive a vaccination, (2) are likely to receive a vaccination, or (3) will not receive a vaccination can assist with planning.
    • Asking employees to raise any immediate private concerns about mandatory vaccination.
  • Consider encouraging vaccination by rewarding employees, paying for any costs, and/or permitting employees to take paid time for the vaccination if scheduled by the employer.
  • Consider remote work, workplace isolation by shifts or areas, and/or physical solutions (masks, barriers, air purifiers, etc.) for objections to vaccination.
  • Consider leaves of absence or termination of employees as a final resort.

As the vaccine process continues, the laws, rules, and guidance on vaccination policies will also continue to develop. Please call or email Jeff Miller at 216.658.2323 or jcmiller@bmdllc.com with any questions or planning advice or any member of BMD’s Labor + Employment Team.

[1] Since you’re checking this footnote, I’m guessing you’re under 40. I’m not going to tell you where you can find the small town of Bomont. I used to think of myself as a Ren MacCormack, even though I was always really a Willard Hewitt. Both are heroes. Do yourself a favor and find them on your own.   


HHS Revokes Public Comment Requirement on Certain Policy Changes

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has revoked the Richardson Waiver, eliminating the requirement for public notice and comment on certain policy changes. This decision allows HHS to implement new policies more quickly, potentially affecting healthcare funding rules like Medicaid work requirements. While it speeds up policymaking, it also reduces opportunities for stakeholder input, raising concerns over transparency and unintended consequences for healthcare providers, states, and patients.

Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.