Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Another Drug Manufacturer Pursues Rebate Program as 340B Alternative

Client Alert
December 11, 2024

Some of the nation’s largest drug manufacturers are forging ahead to implement rebate programs for 340B drugs, even after the federal government has called these programs illegal.

In August 2024, Johnson & Johnson first announced its plan to implement a drug rebate program for 340B drugs whereby the manufacturer would charge buyers full price for drugs and offer a back-end rebate, instead of allowing safety net providers to purchase outpatient drugs at lower costs, as they have done since the program’s inception.

In response, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the federal agency that oversees the 340B drug pricing program, deemed Johnson & Johnson’s rebate program illegal, prompting Johnson & Johnson to initially revoke the rebate plan. However, Johnson & Johnson had a change of heart and on November 12, 2024, filed a lawsuit to challenge HRSA’s decision.

Emboldened, other drug manufacturers have begun to implement drug rebate programs. On November 26, 2024, Bristol Myers Squibb filed a lawsuit against HRSA, asking the federal court to deem its rebate program legal and prevent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from taking agency action to invalidated rebates.

While it is unclear how these federal courts will rule, these lawsuits signal a desire by drug makers to change how they offer 340B drug discounts to health care providers that operate using scarce federal resources, a move that could threaten the sustainability of safety net providers and the patients they serve.

If you have questions about these lawsuits, or the 340B program in general, please contact Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Jordan Burdick at jaburdick@bmdllc.com.

Health LawHealthcareHRSA
Client Alert

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

February 26, 2025Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.Client Alert

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

February 25, 2025In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.Client Alert

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

February 20, 2025The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.Client Alert

Status Update: Physician Noncompete Agreements in Ohio

February 11, 2025Noncompete agreements remain enforceable in Ohio if they meet specific legal requirements. While the AMA and FTC have challenged these restrictions, courts continue to uphold reasonable noncompete provisions for physicians. Recent cases, like MetroHealth System v. Khandelwal, highlight how courts may modify overly restrictive agreements to balance employer interests with patient care. With ongoing legal challenges to the FTC’s proposed ban, Ohio physicians should consult a healthcare attorney before signing or challenging a noncompete agreement.Client Alert

Immigration Orders and Their Economic Impact on Small Business: Insights from Attorney and Former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff

January 30, 2025President Trump's recent executive orders, targeting immigration policies, could significantly impact small businesses in Ohio, particularly those owned by undocumented immigrants. With stricter visa vetting, halted refugee admissions, and potential deportations, these businesses face uncertainty, workforce disruption, and closures. Ohio's immigrant-owned businesses, especially in food services and transportation, contribute billions to the state economy, and any disruption could result in economic ripple effects.
Older posts
Newer posts