Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

CLIENT ALERT: Ohio Incentivizes Cybersecurity Measures

Client Alert

On November 2, 2018, Ohio’s Data Protection Act (“DPA”) went into effect.  The DPA incentivizes Ohio businesses to proactively address cybersecurity and data protection by providing an affirmative defense/safe harbor for claims related to data breach. However, the safe harbor is only applicable if the organization can prove “reasonable compliance” to the DPA.

Brennan Manna Diamond (“BMD”) can assist your business by creating written policies that demonstrate compliance with Ohio law in the spirit of the DPA.  Additionally, BMD can educate your organization as to implementing and adhering to those policies.

The DPA is the culmination of Ohio’s efforts to foster a legal, technical, and collaborative cybersecurity environment to help businesses thrive. The only way to reap this benefit is to meet its requirements.

How to Comply

Any organization maintaining personal information of Ohio residents can be subject to Ohio’s breach notification laws and potential civil liability for data breach compromising such information.  The DPA rewards proactivity vs. reactivity by incentivizing businesses to implement policies and procedures to protect the security and confidentiality of personal/restricted information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of the personal/restricted information and protect against unauthorized access of information that is likely to result in a material risk of identity theft or other fraud. Businesses should take the following steps:

  • Businesses must determine “reasonable” security measures. Such analysis must consider:
    •  The size of the business;
    • The nature, sensitivity and use of information;
    • The resources available to the business; and
    • The cost to implement and maintain the reasonable security measures to protect against a breach of security relative to the business’ resources.
  • Businesses must implement a cybersecurity framework and the DPA recognizes certain existing frameworks of which businesses can utilize in order to qualify for safe harbor. These include:
    • Industry recognized cybersecurity frameworks, (i.e., those recommended by administrative bodies, like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST);
    • Regulatory frameworks required by federal or state law (i.e., HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley); or
    • A framework that combines the payment card industry (PCI) data security standard with a current version of an applicable industry recognized cybersecurity framework.
  • Businesses must create and maintain written cybersecurity policies and procedures. Such policies and procedures must contain administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the protection of personal/restricted information.
  • Businesses must periodically review changes in regulations and framework updates and must likewise update its cybersecurity program.

BMD's Solution

In addition to implementing industry standard cybersecurity frameworks, prudent businesses will create and maintain written policies as it relates to cybersecurity and data protection. BMD can assist in crafting the policies and identifying proper security frameworks so that your business qualifies for the safe harbor. The Ohio legislature was mindful not to be hyper-technical with the regulations so that businesses can still qualify for the safe harbor by demonstrating reasonable efforts to comply. BMD can help navigate these regulations.

In today’s ever-changing cybersecurity landscape, data breaches are at times, inevitable. BMD can also provide post-breach solutions including meeting applicable reporting requirements and litigation defense. As now enacted by Ohio, perhaps the best defense involves proactively investing in front end compliance.

For more information, please contact Brandon T. Pauley. 


Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content, but it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

Tariffs, Market Downturn, and Employment Considerations for Employers

As tariffs continue to impact various industries, employers must prepare for the ripple effects these economic pressures can have on workforce management. The economic impact can dramatically impact companies’ bottom lines, and companies look to improve finances and save for the future and many will choose to reduce employee count/wages.

Corporate Transparency Act Overhauled: U.S. Entities No Longer Required to Report

The Department of Treasury has issued an interim final rule significantly altering the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As of March 21, 2025, all U.S.-created entities and their beneficial owners are exempt from reporting requirements. Only non-U.S. entities registered to do business in the U.S. must still report, but they are not required to disclose U.S. citizen owners. Business owners should stay informed on these changes and consult legal counsel for compliance guidance.

ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.