Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

CMS’s Rural Health Funding Announcement

Client Alert

Last month, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (“Notice”) for the $50 billion Rural Health Transformation (“RHT”) Program. The RHT Program was created by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act to partially offset the impact of the estimated $137 billion reduction in federal Medicaid spending in rural areas alone, also resulting from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The five-year Program seeks to support rural communities by improving healthcare access, quality, and health outcomes.

CMS’s Notice sets forth the criteria that it will use to determine how RHT funds will be allocated to states. All 50 states are eligible to apply for funding, regardless of the size of their rural population or the needs of their rural hospitals. [1] To receive funds, states must submit their applications by Wednesday, November 5, 2025. A merit review panel will review all applications, and CMS will issue award decisions by December 31, 2025.

Half of the fund ($25 billion) will be distributed equally across states with approved applications, and the remaining $25 billion will be distributed among approved states based on 23 factors. These factors include data-driven measures of a state’s rural health population, rural health facilities, and other state characteristics, such as state-proposed initiatives and state efforts to implement Make America Healthy Again policies. The Notice details the point scoring methodology for each factor and provides examples of initiatives that align with the Program’s goals. As part of the application, states must describe how they will use RHT funds to support their own initiatives. States can consider collaborating with stakeholders to bolster their applications.

States may use RHT funds in a variety of ways. For example, these funds may be used to promote evidence-based, measurable interventions to improve prevention and chronic disease management, recruit and retain clinical workforce talent to rural areas, and support access to opioid use disorder treatment services. The Notice provides a list of impermissible uses of funds, such as to fund new construction or initiatives that fund gender-affirming care.

Participating states must abide by the terms and conditions of their awards, such as satisfying annual reporting requirements. CMS reserves the right to decrease funding or terminate a state’s award if it fails to meet its requirements. States will be assessed on an annual basis throughout the duration of the Program, primarily as it pertains to progress made with their proposed initiatives and policy changes.

While there are uncertainties as to who will benefit the most from RHT funds, CMS has explained “the intent of this funding is not to be used for perpetual operating expenses, but rather for investments that can be made within the duration of the program that will have sustainable impact beyond the end of the program.”

To learn more about the RHT Program and how state applications will be reviewed, please contact Healthcare Member Daphne Kackloudis at dlkackloudis@bmdllc.com or Attorney Kate Crawford at khcrawford@bmdllc.com.


[1] By law, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories are ineligible for funding.


New Ohio Reporting Requirements for Non-Residential Contractors

Ohio’s E-Verify Workforce Integrity Act, effective March 19, 2026, requires all nonresidential construction companies, subcontractors, and labor brokers to use E-Verify to confirm employee work eligibility on projects across the state. The law applies regardless of company size and carries financial penalties and potential restrictions on future state contracts for noncompliance. Some uncertainty remains around requirements for existing employees, making early compliance planning important.

DOT Non-Domiciled CDL Rule

A new rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will significantly narrow eligibility for non-domiciled Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) beginning March 16, 2026. The rule limits eligibility to holders of H-2A, H-2B, and E-2 visas and eliminates Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) as qualifying proof of work authorization. As a result, many lawfully present and work-authorized immigrants, including refugees, asylees, DACA recipients, and Temporary Protected Status holders, will no longer be able to obtain or renew a non-domiciled CDL. The change is expected to affect roughly 194,000 drivers nationwide and has prompted multiple legal challenges, including a pending emergency stay request before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

FinCEN Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule Now in Effect

FinCEN’s new Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule, effective March 1, 2026, requires certain real estate transfers to be reported to combat financial crimes. Transfers of residential property to entities or trusts without financing may require a Real Estate Report.

Department of Education Proposes Redefinition of “Professional Degree,” Excluding Nursing and Limiting Graduate Loan Borrowing

The U.S. Department of Education has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would redefine “professional degree” programs under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The proposal excludes nursing from the recognized list and would impose new borrowing limits for graduate students while eliminating the Grad PLUS program. Public comments are due by March 2, 2026.

First-of-Its-Kind Federal Ruling Finds Use of Consumer AI Tool May Destroy Attorney-Client Privilege

On February 10, 2026, Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a first-of-its-kind ruling finding that documents generated by a criminal defendant using a consumer AI platform were not protected by attorney-client privilege after being shared with counsel. The court treated the AI tool as a third party, concluding that entering sensitive information into a publicly available platform may waive confidentiality. The ruling also suggests that the work product doctrine may not apply where AI-generated materials are created independently by a client rather than at counsel’s direction. The decision signals that parties should exercise caution when using consumer AI tools in connection with legal matters.