Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

FTC Continues to Target Noncompetes

Client Alert

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is targeting noncompete agreements in the healthcare sector, particularly those that may prevent providers from working in areas with high patient need.

On September 10, the FTC Chair sent letters to several large healthcare employers and staffing firms, urging a review of employment and noncompete agreements to ensure they are appropriately tailored and lawful. The letters highlight that unreasonable restrictions on nurses, physicians, and other medical professionals can limit employment options and reduce patient choice, especially in rural communities where healthcare resources are already limited.

While the FTC continues to enforce antitrust laws against noncompetes, it is important to note that it is not currently reinstating the previously proposed nationwide noncompete ban, which courts blocked in 2024. Instead, enforcement will focus on agreements that may be overbroad or unreasonably limit workers’ mobility.

As a call to action, the Deputy Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition emphasized that employers, beyond those receiving letters, should review contracts to ensure that any restrictions comply with the law.

As to Ohio, noncompetes remain generally enforceable. The state has not yet enacted statutes limiting noncompetes, but lawmakers have introduced Senate Bill 11, which would (among other restrictions) prohibit agreements that restrict a worker from joining another employer for a specified period, within a specified geographic area, or in a similar role.

Employers (particularly healthcare employers) should review existing noncompete agreements to ensure compliance with current FTC enforcement measures. Should you need assistance reviewing agreements or have questions regarding noncompetes or the content of this client alert, please contact Partners and Co-Chairs of BMD’s Labor & Employment Group, Adam Fuller or Bryan Meek at adfuller@bmdllc.com or bmeek@bmdllc.com


Don't Get Caught Dazed and Confused: Another Florida Court Weighs in on Employer Obligations to Accommodate Medical Marijuana Use

A Florida trial court ruled in Giambrone v. Hillsborough County that employers may need to accommodate off-duty medical marijuana use under the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA). This contrasts with prior rulings and raises new compliance challenges for employers. With the case on appeal, now is the time to review workplace drug policies.

Corporate Transparency Act to be Re-evaluated

Recent federal rulings have impacted the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. While reporting requirements were briefly reinstated, FinCEN has now paused enforcement and is reevaluating the CTA. Businesses are no longer required to submit reports until further guidance is issued. For updates and legal counsel, contact BMD Member Blake Gerney.

Ohio Recovery Housing Operators Beware: House Bill 58 Seeks to Make Major Changes

Ohio House Bill 58 proposes significant changes to recovery housing oversight, granting ADAMH Boards authority to inspect and investigate recovery residences. The bill also introduces a Certificate of Need (CON) program, requiring state approval for major facility changes. OMHAS will assess applications based on cost, quality, accessibility, and financial feasibility. The bill also establishes a recovery housing residence fund to support inspections. For more information, contact BMD attorneys Daphne Kackloudis or Jordan Burdick.

January 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Brings Notable Changes to HIPAA Security Rule

In January 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the HIPAA Security Rule, aiming to enhance cybersecurity for covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs). Key changes include mandatory compliance audits, workforce training, vulnerability scans, and risk assessments. Comments on the proposed rule are due by March 7, 2025.

Corporate Transparency Act Effective Again

The federal judiciary has issued multiple rulings on the enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Previously, enforcement was halted nationwide due to litigation in Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury. However, on February 18th, the court lifted the stay, reinstating the CTA’s reporting requirements. Non-exempt entities now have until March 21, 2025, to comply. Businesses should act promptly to avoid civil penalties of $591 per day and potential criminal liability.