Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

FTC Continues to Target Noncompetes

Client Alert

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is targeting noncompete agreements in the healthcare sector, particularly those that may prevent providers from working in areas with high patient need.

On September 10, the FTC Chair sent letters to several large healthcare employers and staffing firms, urging a review of employment and noncompete agreements to ensure they are appropriately tailored and lawful. The letters highlight that unreasonable restrictions on nurses, physicians, and other medical professionals can limit employment options and reduce patient choice, especially in rural communities where healthcare resources are already limited.

While the FTC continues to enforce antitrust laws against noncompetes, it is important to note that it is not currently reinstating the previously proposed nationwide noncompete ban, which courts blocked in 2024. Instead, enforcement will focus on agreements that may be overbroad or unreasonably limit workers’ mobility.

As a call to action, the Deputy Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition emphasized that employers, beyond those receiving letters, should review contracts to ensure that any restrictions comply with the law.

As to Ohio, noncompetes remain generally enforceable. The state has not yet enacted statutes limiting noncompetes, but lawmakers have introduced Senate Bill 11, which would (among other restrictions) prohibit agreements that restrict a worker from joining another employer for a specified period, within a specified geographic area, or in a similar role.

Employers (particularly healthcare employers) should review existing noncompete agreements to ensure compliance with current FTC enforcement measures. Should you need assistance reviewing agreements or have questions regarding noncompetes or the content of this client alert, please contact Partners and Co-Chairs of BMD’s Labor & Employment Group, Adam Fuller or Bryan Meek at adfuller@bmdllc.com or bmeek@bmdllc.com


Ohio Legalizes Recreational Marijuana; What’s Next for Ohio Employers?

Recent Changes to the No Surprises Act’s Federal IDR Process

Proposed changes to the No Surprises Act’s independent dispute resolution (IDR) process were recently issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Department of Treasury, and the Office of Personnel Management. The October 27, 2023, proposed rule overhauls the current Federal IDR process in an effort to create efficiencies and reduce delays relating to eligibility determinations and address feedback from interested parties and certified IDR entities.

What Inpatient Behavioral Health Providers Need to Know About ODM's New Draft Rule for Reimbursements

Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) recently released a draft rule that will transform how inpatient behavioral health services are reimbursed for some hospitals. ODM will migrate inpatient payments for behavioral health and substance use disorder services (BH/SUD) provided by freestanding psychiatric hospitals (FSPs) from the APR-DRG payment methodology to a per diem payment methodology derived from the APR-DRG system.

BMD Named to the 2024 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms”

Brennan Manna & Diamond (BMD) is recognized among the leading law firms in the nation according to the 2024 Edition of U.S. News – Best Lawyers®  "Best Law Firms." The firm has ranked in in 13 practice areas and has earned “National Tier 1” rankings in Health Care Law and Litigation-Trusts & Estates.

Friendly Physician Models: The Basics Through 5 Frequently Asked Questions

During the past several years, many health law practices have noticed a dramatic increase in the number of telehealth businesses and private equity backed health care providers. Both of these trends often rely heavily on corporate structures commonly referred to as “friendly physician,” “captive PC” or “MSO” models. Although friendly physician models are used by non-physician health care providers (e.g., physical therapists, psychologists, and dentists), this article focuses on physicians and how the model is used in connection with the provision of professional medical services.