Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

New Construction Contract Requirement for Public Projects

Client Alert

A new Ohio law imposes a disclosure requirement that will affect how public authorities prepare construction contracts—and what happens if they do not comply.

Construction contract negotiations typically begin with an industry standard form agreement. Common examples include the American Institute of Architects (AIA) forms and ConsensusDocs.

Ohio Senate Bill 262 takes effect on September 17, 2026. Under the new law, when a public authority modifies an industry standard form agreement, it must show those changes using strikethrough and underline formatting. If the public authority fails to mark these changes, the modifications are void, and the original standard form language governs.

While industry standards can assist in streamlining negotiations, each construction project comes with its own unique risks and considerations that might call for deviations, small or large, from the “standard” language. More importantly, deviations from standard language are typically negotiated for significant reasons—making compliance with this new marking requirement essential.

For assistance negotiating your next construction contract or implementing procedures to comply with this new requirement, please contact BMD Member Bob Hager at rahager@bmdllc.com or BMD Attorney Jacob Davis at jrdavis@bmdllc.com.


Supreme Court Rules that Employers Must Show Substantial Increased Costs to Legally Decline Employees’ Religious Accommodation Requests

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in Groff v. DeJoy that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) employers must show, in order to decline religious accommodations, that the burden of granting religious accommodations to employees will result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of an employer’s particular business, thus amending the prior, simple standard of a “de minimis” undue hardship.

Recent HIPAA Breach Settlements - Lessons Learned

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the consequences for providers may include settlements of $30,000 to $240,000. OCR recently released two settlements for improper breaches of protected health information (PHI) that are good examples of the major monetary penalties that can result from common HIPAA mistakes.

Supreme Court Issues Major False Claims Act Decision

Telehealth Flexibility Updates: HIPAA, DEA, and CMS

The Covid-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) officially ended on May 11, 2023. But what does that mean for telehealth, a field that expanded exponentially during the PHE? Fortunately, many of the flexibilities will remain intact, at least temporarily. This client alert presents a brief overview of the timelines that providers need to follow, but for a more comprehensive review of telehealth flexibilities and when they will end

WEBINAR SERIES RECAP | Ending the Public Health Emergency + Post-Pandemic Check-Up

Some may take the position that the rest of the country already returned to a new “normal” following the COVID-19 pandemic.  But healthcare providers continue to implement COVID protocols and navigate the ever-changing healthcare regulations at both the federal and state levels.  It is important for healthcare providers to take time for a “Healthcare Check-Up” with the start of 2023 and the ending of the Public Health Emergency (“PHE”).