Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Now in Effect: DOL Final Rule on Classification of Independent Contractors

Client Alert

Effective March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has adopted a new standard for the classification of employees versus independent contractors — a much anticipated update since the DOL issued its Final Rule on January 9, 2024, as previously discussed by BMD

In brief, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) creates significant protections for workers related to minimum wage, overtime pay, and record-keeping requirements. That said, such protection only exists for employees. This can incentivize entities to classify workers as independent contractors; however, misclassification is risky and can be costly. 

New guidance requires the use of a six-factor totality-of-the-circumstances analysis to determine whether the economic realities of the working relationship favor classification as an employee or an independent contractor. Put simply, and per the DOL, if the economic realities demonstrate that the worker is economically dependent on the entity for work, then the worker is an employee. Conversely, if the economic realities demonstrate that the worker is in business for themselves, then they are an independent contractor. 

In making this determination, entities are now required to consider, without limitation: (1) a worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill; (2) investments by either the entity and/or the worker; (3) the degree of permanence in the working relationship; (4) the nature and degree of control; (5) whether the work performed is integral to the entity’s business; and (6) the skill and initiative required for the work. 

In light of the new guidance, now is a great time for entities to review their working relationships and stay ahead on classification issues to avoid liability under the FLSA.

For additional information on the new DOL guidance or how it may impact your company, please reach out to Monica Andress at (330) 253-9153 or mbandress@bmdllc.com, or any member of the Labor and Employment Team of Brennan, Manna & Diamond LLC.


Protecting Your Image in the Age of AI-Generated “Deepfakes”

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed how we create and consume digital content, but it also poses significant risks. Among the most troubling developments in AI is the proliferation of AI-generated fraudulent content, often called “deepfakes”.

Tariffs, Market Downturn, and Employment Considerations for Employers

As tariffs continue to impact various industries, employers must prepare for the ripple effects these economic pressures can have on workforce management. The economic impact can dramatically impact companies’ bottom lines, and companies look to improve finances and save for the future and many will choose to reduce employee count/wages.

Corporate Transparency Act Overhauled: U.S. Entities No Longer Required to Report

The Department of Treasury has issued an interim final rule significantly altering the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As of March 21, 2025, all U.S.-created entities and their beneficial owners are exempt from reporting requirements. Only non-U.S. entities registered to do business in the U.S. must still report, but they are not required to disclose U.S. citizen owners. Business owners should stay informed on these changes and consult legal counsel for compliance guidance.

ODM to Implement Medicaid Work Requirements: What Providers and Medicaid Expansion Recipients Need to Know

The Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) has submitted a waiver to impose work requirements for Medicaid expansion recipients. If approved, the new eligibility criteria will take effect on January 1, 2026. A federal public comment period is open until April 7, 2025.

Ohio Appellate Court Rules in Favor of Gender-Affirming Care

On March 18, 2025, the 10th District Court of Appeals in Franklin County ruled that Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 68, which restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for minors seeking gender-affirming care, violates the Health Care Freedom Amendment and is therefore unenforceable. The court found that the law unlawfully interferes with parental rights and medical decision-making. The case, Moe v. Yost, has been remanded, and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost intends to appeal.