Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Ohio's 2024-2025 Fiscal Budget - Behavioral Health Updates

Client Alert

Ohio’s 2024-2025 State Budget was signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine on July 3, 2023. Behavioral health is an area that Governor DeWine expressed great interest in supporting and the final version of the Budget does reflect some of those initiatives. The Budget prioritizes growing the behavioral health workforce and increasing research and innovation by building community capacity for care that offers better crisis response services and treatment, increased prevention efforts, and increased provision of residential and outpatient services. Outlined below are notable Budget items geared toward achieving growth and improvement in the behavioral health field as well as some key items that were rejected by Governor DeWine’s veto.

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline

988 Lifeline Centers receive 10,000+ calls, chats, and texts each month from Ohioans. Consequently, the Budget has allocated $86.5M across the biennium to crisis centers to ensure Ohioans in need have access to appropriate behavioral health resources close to home and reduce the burden on local law enforcement and emergency departments.

Building the Workforce

In attempting to grow a strong and supportive behavioral health workforce, the Budget provides for increased rates for community behavioral health providers, continued support for Centers of Excellence and Tech Assistance Centers, and investments in pediatric inpatient and residential settings for youth and children. To enhance pediatric behavioral health, $50M in one-time funds have been allocated to enhance the workforce and residential treatment environments.

Building Resiliency through Prevention and Early Identification

Focusing on student mental health, $13.9M across the biennium was allocated for suicide prevention, expansion of the student assistance program, and student wellness and success initiatives including the payment of behavioral wellness coordinators.

Increasing Inpatient Access

$14M across the biennium has been allocated to the growth of state hospital capacity by adding 30 beds and staff support to state psychiatric hospitals in central Ohio. Additionally, these funds will leverage bed availability at private psychiatric hospitals for vulnerable Ohioans without coverage.

Increasing Housing Options and Quality

In distributing a $64.5M allocation across the biennium, the Residential State Supplement (RSS) Program Budget has increased from $16M per year to $24M per year. Further, in providing continued support for community transition programs to help those with mental illness or addiction to successfully re-enter upon prison release, this allocation aids in growing the quality of Recovery Housing across Ohio.

Expanding Jail and Forensic Services

$63.5M across the biennium has been allocated in support of the expansion of jail and forensic services. Specifically, this allocation will aid in enhancing forensic centers’ capacity for court-ordered psychological evaluations and monitoring and support of specialty courts. Additionally, the funds will be used to improve the ability for jails in Ohio to provide addiction services. Lastly, funds will authorize jail-based competency restoration.

Kickstarting Innovation and Research for Wellness and Recovery

$30M across the biennium has been allocated to establish the State of Ohio Action for Resiliency Network (“SOAR”) that will research, establish best practices, and provide funding to implement better mental health and addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery strategies. OhioMHAS will create working groups that incorporate providers, patients, community stakeholders and others to implement this program.  

Relevant Budget Vetoes

House Bill 33 proposed several behavioral health initiatives that did not survive Governor DeWine’s veto. First, HB 33 sought to implement statute-based payment rates for Medicaid components administered by the Department of Developmental Disabilities including personal care services, adult day services, and ICF/IID services. The item was vetoed with DeWine with the reasoning that establishing rates within a statute, rather than a rule, would restrict the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Department of Development Disabilities, and the Ohio Department of Aging’s ability to manage the policies and costs of the Medicaid program while being compliant with federal law.

Second, HB 33 sought to require the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services and the Ohio Department of Medicaid to develop and implement standards and procedures for the exchange of Medicaid recipient information. Specifically, the proposal would have allowed a board of alcohol, drug addiction, and mental health services to advocate on behalf of Medicaid recipients who have been identified as needing addiction or mental health services. However, DeWine vetoed reasoning that a statute requiring the Department of Medicaid to share sensitive Medicaid information would be unnecessarily risky and in violation of federal privacy laws.

Lastly, a proposal in HB 33 would have exempted federally qualified health centers that provide behavioral healthcare services from certification from the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. The item was vetoed with DeWine reasoning that the public wellbeing is best protected when all healthcare services are properly certified by the appropriate state agency.

Should you have any questions on these recent behavioral health updates or how to get involved in these initiatives, please contact Partner Ashley Watson at abwatson@bmdllc.com.


Ohio Businesses Required to Post Exceptions to State-wide Mask Mandate at all Entrances

On July 22, 2020, in conjunction with the state-wide mask mandate instituted by Governor Mike DeWine, Lance D. Himes, Interim Director of the Ohio Department of Health, issued an order requiring Ohio businesses to post any permitted exceptions they provide to customers, patrons, visitors, contractors, vendors and similar individuals to use facial coverings at all business entrances.

ODM and OhioMHAS Continue to Expand Telehealth

On July 17, 2020, Governor DeWine signed Executive Order 2020-29D, which allowed the Ohio Department of Medicaid (“ODM”) to immediately rescind old provisions and file a new rule (5160-1-18) and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“OhioMHAS”) to amend their current rule (5122-29-31), both expanding telehealth and introducing even more flexibility into Ohio’s healthcare system.

Top Questions of Employers - Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law

One month ago, the United States Supreme Court, in Bostock v. Clayton County, determined that federal law (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) protects employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Our earlier post discussed the full decision. The purpose of this article is to share and address the Top Questions of Employers since that decision was rendered.

Healthcare Acquisitions and Divestitures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

It seems as though all aspects of our personal and professional lives have been impacted in one way or another by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Healthcare acquisitions and divestitures are no exception. Although the ramifications depend on the specific circumstances of each transaction, we are noticing certain common threads woven among recently closed and currently in progress transactions in the healthcare industry. Here are a few of the questions that often arise as we work with clients to navigate the current business landscape both during and after the COVID epidemic.

Ministerial Exception to Title VII

On July 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision holding that religious institutions, such as churches and religion-based schools, are shielded from employment discrimination lawsuits — including claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In doing so, the Court decided in favor of two Catholic schools facing legal discrimination claims from former teachers who alleged wrongful termination from their employment for age and disability.