Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Substance Use Disorder Providers: 42 CFR Part 2 Now Enforceable

Client Alert
April 15, 2026

Does your practice treat patients with substance use disorders? Does your practice retain substance use disorder records? If the answer to one of those questions is “yes,” you will want to be aware of the recent updates to 42 CFR Part 2 (“Part 2”) requirements.  

Part 2 extends patient privacy protections by applying stringent protections to a patients’ substance use disorder (“SUD”) medical records. Modifications to Part 2 under the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records Final Rule (“Final Rule”) went into effect on April 16, 2024, with a compliance date of February 16, 2026. The Final Rule modifications better aligned HIPAA and Part 2 standards and clarified previous Part 2 regulations. The following lists key changes that providers should be aware of:

Updated Penalties and Safe Harbor

The new Part 2 regulations apply HIPAA penalties to violations of Part 2. The regulations also create a “safe harbor” for investigative agencies (or those working on behalf of an investigative agency) that act with reasonable diligence before making a demand for records.[1]

Single Consent

The Final Rule “allows a single consent for all future uses and disclosures for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations.”[2]

Updated Content Requirements for Notice of Privacy Practices

The Final Rule creates specific content requirements that a Part 2 program must include in its Notice of Privacy Practices (“Notice”).[3]

A Part 2 Program must include specific information in the header of its Notice, including notifying patients of (1) how their health information may be used and disclosed; (2) their rights with respect to their health information; (3) how to file a complaint concerning a violation of the privacy or security of their health information; (4) their rights concerning their information, and (5) their right to have a copy of the Notice upon request.

In addition, a Part 2 program must include specific descriptions of how it will use and disclose patient records, a list of patients’ rights, such as the right to request restrictions of certain disclosures, a description of how a patient may exercise those rights, and a statement detailing the duties of the Part 2 program.

SUD Counseling Notes

Part 2 creates a new definition describing SUD counseling notes. Under Part 2, SUD counseling notes are “notes recorded (in any medium) by a Part 2 program provider who is a SUD or mental health professional documenting or analyzing the contents of conversation during a private SUD counseling session or a group, joint, or family SUD counseling session and that are separated from the rest of the patient's SUD and medical record.” [4]

The Final Rule mandates that a Part 2 program must obtain consent for any use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes, except:

  • To carry out the following treatment, payment, or health care operations:
    • Use by the originator of the SUD counseling notes for treatment;
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program for its own training programs in which students, trainees, or practitioners in SUD treatment or mental health learn under supervision to practice or improve their skills in group, joint, family, or individual SUD counseling; or
    • Use or disclosure by the Part 2 program to defend itself in a legal action or other proceeding brought by the patient.
  • Use or disclosure that is required or permitted with respect to the oversight of the originator of the SUD counseling notes.[5]

The Final Rule also adds clarification that a written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes may only be combined with another written consent for a use or disclosure of SUD counseling notes.[6]

Next Steps

Practices and providers will want to ensure that any policies are up to date and reflect the changes that are now enforceable under Part 2. We recommend engaging an attorney to review or update your current policies in order to ensure compliance with Part 2 updates.

To learn more about how the updates to 42 CFR Part 2 could impact your practice, please contact BMD Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com or 330-253-2001. 

[1] 42 CFR Sec. 2.3. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[2] 42 CFR Sec. 2.33. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf. See also, Fact Sheet 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, available at https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/regulatory-initiatives/fact-sheet-42-cfr-part-2-final-rule/index.html#ftn1.

[3] 42 CFR Sec. 2.22, See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[4] 42 CFR Sec. 2.11. See also, 42 CFR Sec. 2.12. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12474-12475 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[5] 42 CFR Sec. 2.31. See also, 89 Fed. Reg. 12476 (February 16, 2024), available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-02-16/pdf/2024-02544.pdf.

[6] Id.

HealthcareHealth LawHealthcare PolicyJeana Singleton
Client Alert

Ohio Department of Health Releases Updated Charge Limits for Medical Records

March 7, 2022Under Ohio law, a healthcare provider or medical records company that receives a request for a copy of a patient's medical record may charge an amount in accordance with the limits set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 3701.741. The allowable amounts are increased or decreased annually by the average percentage of increase or decrease in the consumer price index for all urban consumers, prepared by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, for the immediately preceding calendar year over the calendar year immediately preceding that year, as reported by the Bureau. The Director of the Ohio Department of Health makes this determination and adjusts the amounts accordingly. The list is then published, here.Client Alert

No Surprises Act Compliance (Published by NAMAS, 2/25/22)

March 7, 2022The Department of Health and Human Services published three parts to the No Surprises Act towards the end of 2021, which took effect January 1, 2022. The Act is intended to protect consumers from “balance billing,” which occurs when a patient receives a bill with a higher price than they may have anticipated because they did not have knowledge that the provider or facility was out-of-network. The purpose of this article is to note certain requirements that compliance employees will need to be aware of at their facilities, including notice and consent, good faith estimates, and public disclosures.Client Alert

No Surprises Act and You (Published in the SCMS Winter 2022 Newsletter)

March 3, 2022Legislation has been adopted by the United States Congress and the Ohio Legislature known as the “No Surprises Act” which attempts to regulate billing by professionals and facilities to patients who are not in networks with those facilities or providers at those facilities. The federal bill was triggered by some sensational news stories of patients being billed for tens of thousands of dollars for emergency care when the hospital was out of the network under the patient’s insurance plans.Client Alert

Are You Impacted by the Project Labor Agreement Executive Order?

February 28, 2022Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) are a quasi-collective bargaining agreement between employers and unions. They establish the terms and conditions of employment, including dispute resolution. They are put into place on specific projects and apply to the contractor, whether it is union or non-union. Employees hired on the project will be treated as union.Client Alert

No Surprises Act Update: Federal Judge Strikes Portions of the No Surprises Act

February 25, 2022In a win for providers, a Texas federal court granted the Texas Medical Association’s (TMA) motion for summary judgment and struck down portions of a federal rule that establishes a reimbursement rate arbitration process between payors and providers under the No Surprises Act (NSA).
Older posts
Newer posts