Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Corporate Transparency Act Is Back in Effect: Are You Ready?

Client Alert

On December 5, 2024, the Federal Government was enjoined from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al v. Garland et al, No. 4:2024 cv 00478 - Document 30 (E.D. Tex. 2024). At least for now, that prior ruling has been overturned and the filing requirements under the CTA are back in effect. 

On December 23, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted the Federal Government’s emergency motion for a stay of the nationwide injunction pending appeal. According to the Fifth Circuit, the Federal Government “met its burden” for it to issue a stay and reinstate the obligations under the CTA.

In addition to the widely circulated court opinion, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) website gives businesses the following guidelines:

  • First, reporting companies that were created or registered prior to January 1, 2024, now have until January 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN (it was previously January 1, 2025).
  • Second, reporting companies created or registered on or after September 4, 2024, that had a filing deadline between December 3, 2024, and December 23, 2024, have until January 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN (it was previously 30 days from creation or registration).
  • Third, reporting companies created or registered on or after December 3, 2024, and on or before December 23, 2024, have an additional 21 days from their original filing deadline to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN (it was previously 90 days from creation or registration).

What to do now?
Based on the Court ruling and update to the FinCEN website, reporting companies are required to comply with the law and file beneficial ownership reports as provided in FinCEN’s regulations, albeit with the updated deadlines described above.

For guidance on complying with these updated requirements, business owners should reach out to their BMD legal advisors or contact BMD Member Blake Gerney at brgerney@bmdllc.com.


Parental Consent May Soon Be Required for Minor Mental Health Services in Ohio

HB 172 proposes repealing a provision in Ohio law that allows minors age 14 and older to consent to limited outpatient mental health services without parental involvement. The bill would require parental consent for all such care and remove related language from other sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

Community Behavioral Health Providers - Supervisor Pricing Changes Begin July 1 [Corrected Date]

Effective June 16, community behavioral health providers wishing to receive reimbursement at the supervisor rate must add the HP or HT Modifier to fee-for-service (FFS) claims. Find out about the new guidelines.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance for Emergency Abortions

On June 3, 2025, CMS withdrew its 2022 guidance on emergency abortion care under EMTALA, eliminating federal protection for providers in states with abortion restrictions. This policy change could significantly impact how hospitals handle emergency care involving pregnancy complications.

Supreme Court Eliminates Higher Burden for Majority-Group Plaintiffs in Title VII Claims

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that all Title VII plaintiffs, whether from majority or minority groups, must meet the same evidentiary standard. The decision eliminates the “background circumstances rule” and reinforces equal treatment in workplace discrimination claims.

Understanding Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews: A Critical Guide for Immigrants Facing Removal

In his latest article, Immigration Attorney and former Immigration Judge Rob Ratliff offers a clear breakdown of Reasonable Fear vs. Credible Fear Interviews—key procedures for noncitizens seeking protection from persecution or torture. Citing Judge Brian Murphy’s recent ruling on unlawful deportations to South Sudan, Ratliff connects these critical legal standards to current judicial developments. Read the full article at www.removal-defense.com.