Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

AI and Healthcare: Utilization and Risk Mitigation

Blog Post

If you are a healthcare provider, you may want to consider implementing AI into your practice. Why? Data shows that the use of AI in healthcare is growing! In 2026, the American Medical Association (“AMA”) conducted a study of over 1,000 physicians, asking questions about their use of and feelings towards AI.[1] The study indicated that in 2026, over 80% of physicians used AI in their practice, and over 75% stated that AI improved their ability to care for their patients.[2]

Some ways that providers can utilize AI in their healthcare practice are: (1) creating personalized care plans; (2) completing prior authorization forms; or (3) for translation services.[3] When implementing AI into a practice, it is important to remember that AI should be used as a tool, not as a replacement for the provider’s experience and expertise.

AI scribes, which can be used to create documentation, are one type of tool that has gained recent popularity among providers. Using AI scribes as a tool may result in less provider burn-out and more efficient documentation, allowing the provider to allocate more time treating patients. However, there are also potential drawbacks to utilizing AI scribes, such as the AI generating biased or false information.  

It is important to note that providers are ultimately responsible for the information submitted in any form or document. Providers will want to ensure that all information generated by AI is checked for completeness and accuracy. In addition, providers may want to notify patients when they are using AI in order to maintain a positive patient-provider relationship. Finally, any AI software or tool used in conjunction with protected health information (“PHI”) must be HIPAA compliant to protect patient privacy.

Providers are not the only ones using AI in the healthcare space. Payors are also using AI to audit medical records, documentation, coding, and billing for coverage determinations. Providers should expect increased audits and should take steps to confirm compliance with billing and coding requirements.

Ohio is one of many states to start regulating the use of AI. Currently, Ohio Senate Bill 164 seeks to prohibit health insurers from making coverage decisions solely from the use of AI.[4] In addition, Ohio House Bill 525 seeks to ensure that licensed therapists review all AI generated therapeutic recommendations and treatment plans, and to prohibit licensed therapists from using AI to detect emotions or mental states of patients.[5] These two emerging Ohio Bills reinforce that while AI can be helpful within the healthcare space, AI does not and cannot replace the provider.

We recommend engaging an attorney when implementing AI into your practice to ensure compliance with healthcare regulations, such as HIPAA and the False Claims Act.

If you have any questions about how AI can impact your practice, please contact BMD Health Law Member Jeana Singleton at jmsingleton@bmdllc.com.


[1] Augmented Intelligence in Medicine, American Medical Association, last accessed April 9, 2026, available at https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital-health/augmented-intelligence-medicine.

[2] Id.

[3] Governance for Augmented Intelligence, American Medical Association, last accessed April 9, 2026, available at https://edhub.ama-assn.org/steps-forward/module/2833560.

[4] Ohio Senate Bill 164, 136th General Assembly (2025-2026), available at https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/136/sb164.

[5] Ohio House Bill 525, 136th General Assembly (2025-2026), available at https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/136/hb525.


Non-compete Agreements are Under Fire: What Employers Need to Know

Non-compete agreements are an ongoing topic of dispute. Employers and their advocates point to the efficacy of non-competes in protecting proprietary information. Employees and their advocates argue about worker mobility and that employers unduly burden workers’ ability to seek better jobs. The Biden administration has put forth its position, and state legislatures have introduced bills addressing the enforceability of non-competes. Here is what you need to know:

BMD’s Jason Butterworth Quietly Engineers Some of Akron’s Most Impactful Projects

Jason Butterworth, a team member of BMD’s Business & Corporate practice, focuses his practice on finance, real estate, and tax credit law.

Explosive Growth in Pot of Gold Opportunity for Bank (and Other) Cannabis Lenders Driving Erosion of the Barriers

Our original article on bank lending to the cannabis industry anticipated that the convergence of interest between banks and the cannabis industry would draw more and larger banks to the industry. Banks were awash in liquidity with limited deployment options, while bankable cannabis businesses had rapidly growing needs for more and lower cost credit. Since then, the pot of gold opportunity for banks to lend into the cannabis industry has grown exponentially due to a combination of market constraints on equity causing a dramatic shift to debt and the ever-increasing capital needs of one of the country’s fastest growing industries. At the same time, hurdles to entry of new banks are being systematically cleared as the yellow brick road to the cannabis industry’s access to the financial markets is being paved, brick by brick, by the progressively increasing number and size of banks that are now entering the market.

Celebration of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

In recognition of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month (AAPI Heritage Month), Brennan Manna and Diamond is proud to recognize the contributions and achievements of our AAPI members.

Fluresh Cannabis’ Bank Loan: Moving Into the Mainstream

The announcement by Fluresh, a vertically integrated Michigan based cannabis business, of the closing of loans from a federally insured commercial bank totaling almost $50 million represents an important landmark for both Fluresh and the cannabis industry writ large. For Fluresh, perhaps as important as the bottom-line benefits of lower cost financing, the fact that its operations and financials passed muster with a substantial commercial bank can be regarded as an important rite of passage. For the industry, it reflects its inexorable movement out of the shadows and into the mainstream. This substantiates the view that, whether or not any of pending the federal legislation is enacted, bank lending to the cannabis industry will continue to accelerate.